Lesson Report:
### Lesson Report
#### **Title: Interpreting Data for Argumentation in Research Writing**
In this session, students worked on crafting argument-driven interpretations based on collected data. The class focused on common pitfalls in data interpretation and how to refine analytical writing to include both evidence and argumentation. By the end of the lesson, students were expected to produce a concise interpretative paragraph that effectively connects data to an argument.
—
### **Attendance**
– Four students arrived late.
– One student (Farhunda) joined remotely after the session had started.
—
### **Topics Covered**
#### **1. Recap of Previous Session**
– Quick five-minute summary of prior work for early attendees.
– Explanation of how to transition from data collection and analysis to forming conclusions.
– Reminder about the importance of specificity in methodological explanations (e.g., precise application of process tracing).
#### **2. Introduction to Interpreting Data**
– Discussion of common mistakes in interpretation:
– Overgeneralization without explaining analytical steps.
– Statements that lack clear argumentative direction.
– Emphasis on the difference between summarizing data and making a meaningful argument.
#### **3. Example-Based Learning: Evaluating Interpretation Paragraphs**
– Provided a sample research question:
*”How have Kyrgyz newspapers framed the 2020 protests?”*
– Read and analyzed two sample interpretation paragraphs:
– **First paragraph (weaker example):**
– Data was presented in full but lacked an argument.
– No explicit connection between trends and the research question.
– **Second paragraph (stronger example):**
– Clear argumentative structure.
– Data used to support a claim on how media sources align with different political interests.
– Discussion on improving paragraph structure:
– The necessity of a strong topic sentence that introduces the argument.
– The importance of an explicit takeaway or conclusion in the final sentence.
#### **4. Identifying Key Characteristics of Strong Interpretations**
– Breakdown of essential components for an interpretation paragraph:
– Clearly stated argument in the topic sentence.
– Specific data points that support the claim.
– A concluding sentence that reinforces the significance of the interpretation.
– Emphasis on avoiding purely descriptive writing without analysis.
#### **5. Practical Application: Writing an Interpretation Paragraph**
– Students were tasked with drafting their own argument-driven interpretation paragraph based on a selected dataset.
– Peer review and discussion followed:
– Identification of argument weaknesses.
– Suggestions for improving clarity and depth.
—
### **Actionable Items**
#### **Urgent Course Deadlines**
– **Deadline for Chapters 2 & 3 has been extended.**
– Students now have four weeks to complete the rest of their theses.
– Need to pace work accordingly to meet the final deadline.
#### **Follow-Up Actions for Students**
– **Refine data interpretation:**
– Ensure all arguments are clearly structured and not just descriptive.
– **Check and improve methodology sections:**
– Avoid overgeneralized explanations; be explicit about analytical steps.
– **Continue practicing argumentation in writing:**
– Future assignments should demonstrate clear argumentative connections to research questions.
#### **Instructor Notes**
– Consider revisiting interpretation techniques in a later session to reinforce learning.
– Monitor Chapter 2 & 3 submissions for recurring issues with generalization and argumentation.
—
This summary provides a clear record of the session’s activities and outlines key learning moments for future reference.
Homework Instructions:
NO HOMEWORK. There is no explicit mention of an assigned homework task in the lesson transcript. The professor primarily focuses on extending the deadline for chapters two and three, discussing common mistakes in data interpretation, and conducting an in-class activity to improve students’ ability to craft argument-driven analytical paragraphs.